Central City School District 133
Central City School District 133 is located in south Illinois. Central City School District 133 has 12.58 square miles of land area and 0.49 square miles of water area. As of 2010-2014, the total Central City School District 133 population is 2,019. Central City School District 133 median household income is $39,402 in 2010-2014. Central City School District 133 median house value is $59,400 in 2010-2014. On average, Central City School District 133 is worse than the state average in quality.
| Hot Rankings |
Central City School District 133 Map and Nearby Locations
129 Douglas St
Centralia IL, 62801, Marion County
Phone: 618-532-9521
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | |
Total Students: | 279 | 265 | 257 | 224 | 216 | 228 | 231 |
English Language Learner Students: | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Teachers: | 16.29 | NA | 16.00 | 17.75 | 19.43 | 19.40 | 15.00 |
Prekindergarten: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 1.11 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 |
Kindergarten: | NA | NA | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.40 | 1.00 |
Elementary: | 15.29 | NA | 15.00 | 16.64 | 17.43 | 17.00 | 9.00 |
Secondary: | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 5.00 |
Ungraded: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA |
Total Other Staff: | 5.72 | 11.57 | 1.00 | 1.09 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 5.00 |
Instructional Aides: | NA | 4.64 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Instructional Coordinators & Supervisors: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Total Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Elementary Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Secondary Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Other Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA |
Librarians/Media Specialists: | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Library/Media Support: | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
District Administrators: | 1.00 | NA | 1.00 | 1.09 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
District Administrative Support: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
School Administrators: | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
School Administrative Support: | NA | 1.96 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
Student Support Services: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Other Support Services: | 4.72 | 4.97 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 4.00 |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 17.13 | NA | 16.06 | 12.62 | 11.12 | 11.75 | 15.40 |
Schools
Central City Elementary School | Prekindergarten to Grade 8 | 129 Douglas St, Centralia IL 62801 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | State Average |
ISAT Test | |||||
2003 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 86.1% | 75.7% |
2004 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 68% | 79.1% |
2005 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 77.7% | 79.3% |
2006 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 85.6% |
2007 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 78.3% | 86.7% |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 96.2% | 85.1% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 91.7% | 85.2% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 94.4% | 86.4% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 87.3% |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 96.2% | 87.7% |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 41.2% | 54.8% |
2003 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 62.0% |
2004 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 60% | 65.1% |
2005 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 51.9% | 66.6% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 54.1% | 70.7% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 47.8% | 72.9% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 69.2% | 71.8% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 54.2% | 72.2% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 73.9% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 80.7% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 53.0% | 58.8% |
2006 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 86.4% | 84.8% |
2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 79.1% | 86.4% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 68% | 84.6% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.5% | 85.8% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 100% | 85.9% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 95.2% | 87.7% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.8% | 88.1% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 72.4% | 60.2% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 66.6% | 72.9% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 54.1% | 73.7% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 58.3% | 73.2% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 74.1% | 73.8% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 68% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 76.2% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 82.1% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 62.0% | 59.2% |
2003 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 73.0% | 66.5% |
2004 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 65.6% | 67.8% |
2005 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 71.4% |
2006 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 79.9% |
2007 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 70.8% | 79.7% |
2008 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 76.2% |
2009 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 76.8% |
2010 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 92% | 76.6% |
2011 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 79.4% |
2012 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 89.3% | 79.8% |
2013 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 96.5% | 80.9% |
2003 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 71.9% | 68.3% |
2004 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 80.0% | 71.8% |
2005 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 72.7% | 73.2% |
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 77.3% | 78.6% |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 77.2% | 82.5% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 73.0% | 81.3% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 61.5% | 82.5% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 73.1% | 83.4% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 80% | 84.0% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 95% | 83.6% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 51.8% | 59.4% |
2003 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 50.1% | 60.4% |
2004 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 68.5% | 60.9% |
2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 78.8% | 62.7% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 54.6% | 68.5% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 63.6% | 69.7% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 61.5% | 73.6% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 50.0% | 73.5% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 69.2% | 74.7% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 76% | 76.4% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 90% | 77.8% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 55.5% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 77.8% | 79.1% |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 72.4% | 81.4% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 92% | 82.7% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 95.6% | 82.4% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 76% | 84.6% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 83.9% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 100% | 84.9% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 95.0% | 59.6% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 72.2% | 72.8% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 72.4% | 73.4% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 76% | 79.1% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 73.9% | 79.9% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 72% | 81.2% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 84.1% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 100% | 81.7% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 60.0% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 76.0% |
2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 81.3% | 79.4% |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 82.6% | 80.4% |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 82.7% |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 92% | 84.4% |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 82.6% | 84.3% |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 89.7% | 84.6% |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 84.0% | 59.1% |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 62.8% | 72% |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 62.5% | 73.3% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 73.9% | 77.7% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 73.1% | 77.5% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 68% | 77.4% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 65.2% | 78.8% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 75.9% | 78.1% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 52.0% | 58.5% |
2003 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 65.8% | 73.7% |
2004 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 56.6% | 74.4% |
2005 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 79.3% | 74.6% |
2006 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 80.9% |
2007 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 84.4% | 79.3% |
2008 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 82.6% | 79.2% |
2009 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 88.5% | 79.5% |
2010 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 92% | 82.4% |
2011 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 60.9% | 81.9% |
2012 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 93.1% | 79.9% |
2013 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 84.0% | 79.0% |
2003 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 53.1% |
2004 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 72.7% | 54.4% |
2005 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 61.3% | 54.3% |
2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 88.4% | 78.2% |
2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 90% | 81.3% |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 80.0% | 80.3% |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 81.7% |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 88% | 83.7% |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 96.3% | 86.3% |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 80.7% | 85.0% |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 73.0% | 58.9% |
2003 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 59.2% | 63.7% |
2004 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 60.6% | 67.1% |
2005 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 71% | 72.8% |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 79.2% |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 80.0% | 81.7% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 76.7% | 81.4% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 74.1% | 83.6% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 84% | 84.1% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 85.0% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 76.9% | 86.2% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 69.2% | 59.8% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
School District Fiscal Information
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | |
Total Revenue: | $2,063,000 | $8,027 | $2,364,000 | $10,554 | $2,271,000 | $10,514 | |||
Federal: | $160,000 | $623 | 7.8% | $398,000 | $1,777 | 16.8% | $501,000 | $2,319 | 22.1% |
State: | $1,407,000 | $5,475 | 68.2% | $1,457,000 | $6,504 | 61.6% | $1,315,000 | $6,088 | 57.9% |
Local: | $496,000 | $1,930 | 24.0% | $509,000 | $2,272 | 21.5% | $455,000 | $2,106 | 20.0% |
Total Expenditures: | $2,149,000 | $8,362 | $2,179,000 | $9,728 | $2,327,000 | $10,773 | |||
Total Current Expenditures: | $2,028,000 | $7,891 | $2,053,000 | $9,165 | $2,191,000 | $10,144 | |||
Instructional Expenditures: | $1,267,000 | $4,930 | 62.5% | $1,322,000 | $5,902 | 64.4% | $1,427,000 | $6,606 | 65.1% |
Student and Staff Support: | $78,000 | $304 | 3.8% | $90,000 | $402 | 4.4% | $79,000 | $366 | 3.6% |
Administration: | $265,000 | $1,031 | 13.1% | $258,000 | $1,152 | 12.6% | $268,000 | $1,241 | 12.2% |
Operations, Food, Other: | $418,000 | $1,626 | 20.6% | $383,000 | $1,710 | 18.7% | $417,000 | $1,931 | 19.0% |
Total Capital Outlay: | $8,000 | $31 | $48,000 | $214 | $36,000 | $167 | |||
Construction: | $5,000 | $19 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||
Total Other: | $5,000 | $19 | $1,000 | $4 | $0 | $0 | |||
Interest on Debt: | $38,000 | $148 | $21,000 | $94 | $40,000 | $185 | |||
Total Salary: | $1,135,000 | $4,416 | $1,199,000 | $5,353 | $1,276,000 | $5,907 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Salary: | $795,000 | $3,093 | 70.0% | $856,000 | $3,821 | 71.4% | $927,000 | $4,292 | 72.6% |
Other Salary: | $340,000 | $1,323 | 30.0% | $343,000 | $1,531 | 28.6% | $349,000 | $1,616 | 27.4% |
Total Benefit: | $582,000 | $2,265 | $552,000 | $2,464 | $616,000 | $2,852 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Benefit: | $411,000 | $1,599 | 70.6% | $396,000 | $1,768 | 71.7% | $439,000 | $2,032 | 71.3% |
Other Benefit: | $171,000 | $665 | 29.4% | $156,000 | $696 | 28.3% | $177,000 | $819 | 28.7% |
* Central City School District 133 was rated 2 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.